I have spent my life fighting to empower workers, women and disenfranchised communities. I advocate for and support passing medical aid in-dying laws because they have strict safeguards to protect vulnerable  people from abuse and coercion — while honoring the fundamental  human right to decide how and when we die, when death is inevitable.  All Americans should have the option to decide the end-of-life care that  is right for them in consultation with their doctor and their loved ones. 

– Dolores Huerta, American Labor Leader and Civil Rights Activist

  1. Medical aid-in-dying laws’ strict eligibility requirements protect all patients, including the elderly and those who are disabled. A person must be an adult, terminally ill with six months or less  to live, able to make an informed healthcare decision and able to take the medication themselves.
  2. Medical aid-in-dying laws have over a dozen safeguards — too many, according to some physicians and even more patients. These safeguards include:
    • Two doctors must confirm that the person is terminally ill with six months or fewer to live and has the ability to make an informed healthcare  decision.
    • Two doctors and one witness must confirm that no one is exerting undue influence on the person requesting medical aid in dying.
    • A doctor must counsel the person about all  other available treatment options.
    • The person always remains in control, has to  take the medication by self-ingesting it, and  can change their mind at any time about taking  the medication. Medical aid in dying laws prohibit IV and parenteral injection (an injection under the skin) or infusion (insertion into the vein) as a safeguard against abuse.
  3. It is a crime to unduly influence or coerce  anyone to request or use medical aid in dying.
  4. More than a dozen studies have carefully  examined existing medical aid-in-dying laws.  They conclude medical aid in dying benefits  many terminally ill adults, whether they use the  option or not, because it spurs conversations  about all end-of-life care options, and reduces  suffering by inspiring more frequent usage of  hospice, palliative care and pain management.
  5. While many people request information about  the law and achieve peace of mind knowing it exists, fewer than 1% of people — and  even lower percentages among traditionally  disadvantaged populations — decide to  access the law, further confirming that the law  does not put vulnerable populations at risk.
  6. According to a Journal of Medical Ethics  report about the Oregon Death with Dignity  Act: “Rates of assisted dying in Oregon …  showed no evidence of heightened risk for  the elderly, women, the uninsured … people  with low educational status, the poor, the  physically disabled or chronically ill, minors,  people with psychiatric illnesses including  depression, or racial or ethnic minorities,  compared with background populations.”