Healthcare Improvement & Accountability Project

Ensuring fully-informed, patient-directed care is the prevailing practice in end-of-life medicine and healthcare

  • Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic: Advocating before the U.S. Supreme Court case that people have a private right to choose their healthcare provider under the program's free-choice-of-provider provision, with implications for patient autonomy and access to care.

  • Oregon Association of Hospital and Health Systems v. Oregon: Defended the constitutionality of Oregon’s Health Care Market Oversight program, which regulates large healthcare mergers to protect access to end-of-life, reproductive, and rural care, as well as to promote affordability and equity.

  • Cross v. Montana: ​​Successfully challenged Montana's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, with the court ruling the law unconstitutional under the state's privacy protections, thereby safeguarding families' rights to make personal medical decisions.

If you or someone you love is struggling to get the care you want and deserve, we are here to help. Call us today, or use our legal intake form.

Note: We are not a general legal services provider. We focus on legal issues specifically related to end-of-life care and patient autonomy.

Our Team

Our experienced team of litigators work closely with our pro bono counsel to enforce and expand the rights of terminally ill people. Through our work in the courts, we fight to ensure that everyone can receive high-quality end-of-life care that is in line with their values, wishes and beliefs. In every case we are involved in, Compassion & Choices’ dedicated legal team prioritizes and seeks to advance patient-directed care.

Latest News

Michigan Pregnancy Exclusion Law is Unconstitutional
April 20, 2026

Last week, Michigan’s law that denied pregnant people the ability to make important decisions about their end-of-life care–commonly referred to as a Pregnancy Exclusion– was ruled unconstitutional under Michigan’s Reproductive Freedom Amendment.  The decision came after Michigan women, physicians, and patient advocates joined together to file a lawsuit challenging a Michigan law that denied pregnant…

Read More
Magistrate Judge Recommends Dismissal of Challenge to Colorado’s Medical Aid-in-Dying Law for Lack of Standing
April 3, 2026

United States Magistrate Judge Scott Varholak issued a Recommendation on Tuesday in a lawsuit challenging Colorado’s medical aid-in-dying law, United Spinal v. Colorado, that the Plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed and the pending Motion to Intervene be denied without prejudice. The Magistrate Judge concluded that the Plaintiffs lack standing because none can demonstrate an actual, concrete,…

Read More
General Mailing Address:
Compassion & Choices
8156 S Wadsworth Blvd #E-162
Littleton, CO 80128

Mail contributions directly to:
Compassion & Choices Gift Processing Center
PO Box 485
Etna, NH 03750

Compassion & Choices is a 501 C3 organization. Federal tax number: 84-1328829

candid seal platinum 2025
great nonprofits 2024 top rated badge
Question 1 of 14

Your information entered here will be included on the final copy of your Dementia Advance Directive (addendum).

Name
Birth Date
Paso 1 de 14

Yo estoy completando este documento porque quiero que mi(s) persona designada (s) en la toma de decisiones, médicos y equipo de atención médica, familia, cuidadores y seres queridos conozcan mis deseos respecto al tipo de cuidados que deseo si vivo con demencia.

Nombre
Fecha de nacimiento
Question 1 of 14

Your information entered here will be included on the final copy of your Dementia Advance Directive (addendum).

Name
Birth Date